Beef animal welfare, attitudes and Willingness to Pay: A regional comparison across the Pyrenees

  • Pierre Sans Université de Toulouse, INP-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, UR-1303 ALISS, 23 Chemin des Capelles. 31076 Toulouse Cedex 3
  • Ana I. Sanjuán-López CITA, Agro-Food Economics and Natural Resources Dept., Avda Montañana, 930. 50059 Zaragoza / European Commission JRC-IPTS, AGRILIFE Unit, Edificio Expo, Inca Garcilaso 3. 41092 Seville
Keywords: meat, animal welfare labelling, WTP, cross-regional

Abstract

Attitudes towards beef animal welfare (AW) and Willingness to Pay (WTP) for AW certification are investigated among consumers in two Spanish and two French regions located on both sides of the Pyrenees (n=1213). Attitudes were measured through a scale of 11 animal practices, on which, consumers report their degree of concern and trust on the supply chain compliance. Attitudes significantly differed across regions, especially with respect to those AW practices carried out by farmers, while trust lies behind concerns. Three segments based on individual consumer attitudes are defined by opposing those consumers who are more concerned and who trust more on the compliance with AW standards (n=264, 22%) to those less concerned and who are more uncertain about stakeholders´ compliance with AW rules (n=356, 29%). Consumer location, gender, age and education significantly differed across attitudinal clusters. Results from a contingent valuation survey show that WTP for certified animal friendly beef ranged between 20.6% and 22.6% over the average market price of standard beef, in Spain and France, respectively. Both, consumers’ socio-demographic characteristics and habits regarding beef meat purchasing and attitudes towards farmers influenced this WTP (the more consumers trust in farmers’ involvement in animal welfare, the highest is their WTP), while a negative overall attitude significantly reduced WTP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreoni J, 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100: 464-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234133

Bennett R, 1997. Farm animal welfare and food policy. Food-Policy 22(4): 281-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(97)00019-5

Bennett R, Blaney R, 2002. Social consensus, moral intensity and willingness to pay to address a farm animal welfare issue. J Econ Psychol 23(4): 501-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00098-3

Bennett R, Blaney R, 2003. Estimating the benefits of farm animal welfare legislation using the contingent valuation method. Agr Econ 29(1): 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00149.x

Bennett R, Kelhlbacher A, Balcombe K, 2012. A method for the economic valuation of animal welfare benefits using a single welfare score. Animal Welfare 21: 125-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905674006

Blokhuis HJ, Keeling LJ, Gavinelli A, Serratosa J, 2008. Animal welfare's impact on the food chain. T Food Sci Technol 19 (S1): S79-S87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.007

Carlsson F, 2013. Non-market valuation: stated preference methods. In: The Oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy; Lusk JL, Roosen J & Shogren JF, eds). New York (USA), pp: 181-214.

Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2005. Consumer preferences for food product quality attributes from Swedish agriculture. Ambio 34: 366-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.366

Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2007a. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. Eur Rev Agr Econ 34(3): 321-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbm025

Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2007b. Farm animal welfare—Testing for market failure. J Agr Appl Econ 39(1): 61-73.

Carson RT, Mitchell RC, 1995. Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. J Environ Econ Manage 28(2): 155-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1011

Darby MR, Karni E, 1973. Free competition an optimal amount of fraud. J Law Econ 16: 67-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466756

De Backer CJS, Hudders L, 2015. Meat morals: relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior. Meat Sci 99: 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.011

de Barcellos MD, Krystallis A, de Melo Saab MS, Kügler JO, Grunert KG, 2011. Investigating the gap between citizens' sustainability attitudes and food purchasing behaviour: Empirical evidence from Brazilian pork consumers. Int J Consum Stud 35(4): 391-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00978.x

de Jonge J, van Trijp HM, 2013. Meeting heterogeneity in consumer demand for animal welfare: A reflection on existing knowledge and implications for the meat sector. J Agr Environ Ethics 26(3): 629-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9426-7

de Jonge J, van Trijp HM, Goddard E, Frewer L, 2008. Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework. Food Qual Prefer 19(5): 439-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002

EC, 2012. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committe on the European Union Strategy for the protection and Welfare of animals 2012-2015. COM(2012) 6 final/2. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/actionplan/docs/aw_strategy_19012012_en.pdf [December 2014].

Eurobarometer, 2007. Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals - Wave 2. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/docs/aw_arch_hist_sp_barometer_fa_en.pdf [December 2014].

Fernqvist F, Ekelund L, 2014. Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food - A review. Food Qual Prefer 32, Part C: 340-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.005

Fishbein M, Ajzen I, 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA. 578 pp.

Flachaire E, Hollard G, 2007. Starting point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Resour Energ Econ 29(3): 183-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.05.003

Gracia A, Zeballos G, 2011. Animal welfare concern and attitudes towards more animal welfare friendly meat products: characterization and segmentation. ITEA 107(1): 33-47.

Gracia A, Loureiro ML, Nayga RM, 2011. Valuing an EU animal welfare label using experimental auctions. Agr Econ 42(6): 669-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00543.x

Hanemann WM, Loomis J, Kanninen B, 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agr Econ 73: 1255-1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1242453

Hanemann WM, Loomis J, Kanninen BJ, 1999. Statistical analysis of discrete response CV data. In: Valuing Environmental preferences; Bateman IJ & Willis KG, eds). New York (USA), pp: 302-442.

Harpman DA, Welsch MP, 1999. Measuring goodness of fit for the doublebounded logit model. Comment. Am J Agr Econ 81: 235-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244463

Heerwagen L, Mørkbak M, Denver S, Sandøe P, Christensen T, 2015. The role of quality labels in market-driven animal welfare. J Agr Environ Ethics 28(1): 67-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9521-z

Herriges JA, 1999. Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model. Comment. Am J Agr Econ 81: 231-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244462

Ipsos-LE, 2013. Consumer market study on the functioning of voluntary food labelling schemes for consumers in the European Union EAHC/FWC/2012 86 04. Final Report. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/market_studies/food_labelling/docs/final_report_food_labelling_scheme_full_en.pdf [December 2014].

Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, 1992. Valuing public goods:The purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manage 22: 57-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S

Kehlbacher A, Bennett R, Balcombe K, 2012. Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling. Food Policy 37(6): 627-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.002

Krinsky I, Robb AL, 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 68: 715-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1924536

Lagerkvist CJ, Hess S, 2011. A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Eur Rev Agr Econ 38(1): 55-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq043

Lagerkvist CJ, Carlsson F, Viske D, 2006. Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: A choice experiment. AgBioForum 9(1): 51-58.

Liljenstolpe C, 2008. Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness 24(1): 67-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20147

Lusk JL, 2011. The market for animal welfare. Agr Human Values 28(4): 561-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9318-x

MAAPRAT, 2009. Consommation de viande. Available in www.agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf_syntheseviande0910.pdf [September 2014].

MAGRAMA, 2010. Panel de consumo alimentario. Available in http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/panel-de-consumo-alimentario/base-de-datos-de-consumo-en-hogares/consulta10.asp [September 2014].

Markosayan A, McCluskey JJ, Wahl T, 2009. Consumer response to information about a functional food product. Apples enriched with antioxidants. Can J Agr Econ 57(3): 325-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01154.x

Mittal V, Kamakura WA, Govind R, 2004. Geographic patterns in customer service and satisfaction: An empirical investigation. J Market 68(3): 48-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.3.48.34766

Moran D, McVittie A, 2008. Estimation of the value the public places on regulations to improve broiler welfare. Anim Welfare 17(1): 43-52.

Napolitano F, Braghieri A, Piasentier E, Favotto S, Naspetti S, Zanoli R, 2010a. Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay. Food Qual Prefer 21(2): 207-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.007

Napolitano F, Girolami A, Braghieri A, 2010b. Consumer liking and willingness to pay for high welfare animal-based products. T Food Sci Technol 21(11): 537-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.07.012

Nocella G, Hubbard L, Scarpa R, 2010. Farm animal welfare, consumer willingness to pay, and trust: Results of a cross-national survey. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 32(2): 275-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppp009

Nocella G, Boecker A, Hubbard L, Scarpa R, 2012. Eliciting consumer preferences for certified animal-friendly foods: Can elements of the theory of planned behavior improve choice experiment analysis? Psychology & Marketing 29(11): 850-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20569

Olynk NJ, Ortega DL, 2013. Consumer preferences for verified dairy cattle management practices in processed dairy products. Food Control 30(1): 298-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.030

Park T, Loomis JB, Creel M, 1991. Land economics. Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Econ 67(1): 64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146486

Sanjuán AI, Resano H, Zeballos G, Sans P, Panella-Riera N, Campo MM, Khliji S, Guerrero A, Oliver MA, Sañudo C, et al., 2012. Consumers' willingness to pay for beef direct sales. A regional comparison across the Pyrenees. Appetite 58(3): 1118-1127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.03.001

Sans P, de Fontguyon G, Giraud G, 2008. Value-based labels for fresh beef: an overview of French consumer behaviour in a BSE crises context. Int J Consum Stud 32(5): 407-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00708.x

Sans P, Guillot C, Magdelaine P, 2011. Caractéristiques de la consommation des viandes de volaille: une comparaison des données du panel Kantar Worldpanel avec celles de l'enquête «Budget de famille» de l'Insee. 9èmes Journées de la Recherche Avicole, Tours (France), 29-30/03. pp: 24-28.

Santini F, Guri F, Gomez y Paloma S, 2013. Labelling of agricultural and food products of mountain farming. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Available in https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/jrc77119.pdf [December 2014].

Scarpa R, Zanoli R, Bruschi V, Naspetti S, 2013. Inferred and stated attribute non-attendance in food choice experiments. Am J Agr Econ 95(1): 165-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas073

Taylor N, Signal T, 2009. Willingness to pay: Australian consumers and 'on the farm' welfare. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 12(4): 345-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700903163658

Thelen S, Ford JB, Honeycutt Jr ED, 2006. The impact of regional affiliation on consumer perceptions of relationships among behavioral constructs. J Busin Res 59(9): 965-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.007

Toma L, McVittie A, Hubbard C, Stott AW, 2011. A structural equation model of the factors influencing British consumers' behaviour toward animal welfare. J Food Prod Market 17(2/3): 261-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2011.548748

Toma L, Stott AW, Revoredo-Giha C, Kupiec-Teahan B, 2012. Consumers and animal welfare. A comparison between European Union countries. Appetite 58(2): 597-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.015

Tonsor G, Olynk N, Wolf C, 2009. Consumer preferences for animal welfareattributes: The case of gestation crates. J Agr Appl Econ 41(3): 713-730.

Van Loo EJ, Caputo V, Nayga Jr RM, Verbeke W, 2014. Consumers' valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy 49 (1): 137-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002

Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, 2014. Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: challenges and opportunities. J Agr Environ Ethics 27(1): 153-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9479-2

Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Poucke Ev, Tuyttens FAM, 2007. Segmentation based on consumers' perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. Int J Sociol Agr Food 15(3): 91-107.

Verain MCD, Bartels J, Dagevos H, Sijtsema SJ, Onwezen MC, Antonides G, 2012. Segments of sustainable food consumers: a literature review. Int J Consum Stud 36(2): 123-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01082.x

Published
2015-08-28
How to Cite
SansP., & Sanjuán-LópezA. I. (2015). Beef animal welfare, attitudes and Willingness to Pay: A regional comparison across the Pyrenees. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(3), e0105. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015133-7273
Section
Agricultural economics