Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to participate in water allocation trading. A case study in southern Spain

  • Giacomo Giannoccaro University of Cordoba, Dpt. Agricultural Economics, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba
  • Manuela Castillo University of Cordoba, Dpt. Agricultural Economics, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba
  • Julio Berbel University of Cordoba, Dpt. Agricultural Economics, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba
Keywords: contingent valuation, irrigation, farmer’s attitude, Heckman model, water markets

Abstract

This study aims to uncover the factors that influence farmers’ attitudes towards water allocation trading. In the study, we simulate two water availability scenarios, an average year and a drought year, in a contingent valuation experiment with 241 farmers. A survey was held in the spring of 2012 in the Guadalquivir and Almanzora River Basins. First, we estimated a multinomial logit model to determine the factors that influence farmers to decide to participate in our hypothetical market. We then analysed the structural and socio-economic factors determining the monetary value of traded water using Heckman’s two-step model. Our results indicate that those farmers who are more innovative and have had agricultural training show a higher willingness to participate in water trading. Additionally, low water-supply guarantee and appropriate information about seasonal water availability increase the probability of participation. Higher willingness to pay (WTP) for water is found in horticulture and among farmers who grow citrus and other permanent crops; lower water selling value (WTA) is found in farms with extensive annual crops and traditional olive groves. However, monetary values (WTP/WTA) are strongly dependent on the current cost of irrigation water services. While findings of this research seem to support the idea of diffusion innovation theory, the existence of ethical concerns that might influence farmers’ acceptance of irrigation water markets needs further analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfarra A, Sonneveld BGJS, Hoetzl BGJS, 2013. Farmers' willingness to pay for treated wastewater in the Jordan valley. Sky J Agric Res 2(6): 69-84.

Arriaza M, Gómez-Limón JA, Upton M, 2002. Local water markets for irrigation in southern Spain: a multicriteria approach. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 46: 21-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00165

Berbel J, Kolberg S, Martin-Ortega J, 2012. Assessment of the draft hydrological basin plan of the Guadalquivir river basin (Spain). Int J Water Resour Dev 28(1): 43-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.640875

Berbel J, Pedraza V, Giannoccaro G, 2013. The trajectory towards basin closure of an European river: Guadalquivir. Int J River Basin Manage 11(1): 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2013.768625

Berbel J, Giannoccaro G, Gutierrez C, 2014. Scenarios and typology of water markets for Guadalquivir. CAP & TRADE Project Report. University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain. http://helvia.uco.es/xmlui/handle/10396/12055

Bjornlund H, 2003. Farmer participation in markets for temporary and permanent water in southeastern Australia. Agr Water Manage 63: 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00091-X

Bjornlund H, 2006. Increased participation in Australian water markets. In: Sustainable irrigation management, technologies and policies; Lorenzini G & Brebbia CA (Eds). pp: 289-302. WIT Press, Southampton. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SI060281

Bjornlund H, Rossini P, 2005. Fundamentals determining prices and activities in the markets for water allocations. Int J Water Res Dev 21(2): 355-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900620500036463

Bjornlund H, Xu W, Wheeler S, 2014. An overview of water sharing and participation issues for irrigators and their communities in Alberta: Implications for water policy. Agric Water Management 154: 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.09.020

Calatrava Leiva J, Sayadi S, 2005. Economic valuation of water and willingness to pay analysis in tropical fruit production in South-Eastern Spain. Span J Agric Res 3(1): 25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2005031-121

Colino-Sueiras J, Martínez-Paz JM, 2002. El agua en la agricultura del sureste español: productividad, precio y demanda. Mediterráneo Económico 2: 199-221, http://www.publicacionescajamar.es/pdf/publicaciones-periodicas/mediterraneo-economico/2/2-12.pdf.

Cook J, Rabotyagov S, 2014. Assessing irrigators' preferences for water market lease attributes with a stated preferences approach. Water Resour Econ 7: 19-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2014.10.001

EC, 2012. A blueprint to safeguard Europe's water resources. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0673.

Garrido A, Iglesias E, Blanco M, 1996. Análisis de la actitud de los regantes en el establecimiento de precios públicos y de mercados de agua. Revista Española de Economía Agraria 78: 139-162.

Giannoccaro G, Pedraza V, Berbel J, 2013. Analysis of stakeholders' attitudes towards water markets in southern Spain. Water 5(4): 1517-1532. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w5041517

Giannoccaro G, Castillo M, Berbel J, 2015. An assessment of farmers' willingness to participate in water trading in southern Spain. Water Policy 17: 520-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.092

Grafton Q, Landry C, Libecap G, McGlennon S, O'Brien B, 2010. An integrated assessment of water markets: Australia, Chile, China, South Africa and the USA. NBER Working Paper No. 16203. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, USA.

Heckman JJ, 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352

Hernández-Mora N, De Stefano L, 2013. Los mercados informales de agua en España: Una primera aproximación. In: Usos del agua. Concesiones, autorizaciones y mercados del agua; Embid Irujo A (ed), Thomson-Reuters, Cizur Menor [in press].

Horowitz JK, McConnell KE, 2002. A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manage 44: 426-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1215

Lee LF, 1983. Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 51(2): 507-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912003

Mesa-Jurado MA, Martin-Ortega J, Ruto E, Berbel J, 2012. The economic value of guaranteed water supply for irrigation under scarcity conditions. Agric Water Manage 113: 10-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.009

Nicol LA, Klein KK, 2006. Water market characteristics: Results from a survey of southern Alberta irrigators. Can Water Resour J 31: 91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3102091

Oses-Eraso N, Viladrich-Grau M, 2007. Appropriation and concern for resource scarcity in the commons: An experimental study. Ecol Econ 63(2-3): 435-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.016

Ortiz Miranda D, Ceña Delgado F, 2001. Los derechos de propiedad en la agricultura de regadío: su situación frente al cambio institucional. [THE IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE ON OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE]. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 1(2): 93-110. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/28739

Palomo-Hierro S, Gómez-Limón JA, Riesgo L, 2015. Water markets in Spain: Performance and challenges. Water 7: 652-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w7020652

Rey D, Garrido A, Calatrava J, 2014. Water markets in Spain: Meeting twenty-first century challenges with twentieth century regulations. In: Water markets for 21st century: What have we learned?; Easter KW & Huang Q (Eds). pp. 127-147. Springer, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9081-9_7

Rogers E (Eds.), 2003. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York.

Smits J, 2003. Estimating the Heckman two-step procedure to control for selection bias with SPSS. www.ats.ucla.edu/STAT/SPSS/output/logistic.htm

Train KE, 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. University Press: Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753930

Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Shanahana M, Zuo A, 2009. Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn–Murray irrigation district, Australia 1998–1999. Agr Econ 40: 631-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00404.x

Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Zuo A, Shanahana M, 2010. The changing profile of water traders in the Goulburn-Murray irrigation district, Australia. Agr Water Manage 97(9): 1333-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.015

Published
2016-03-02
How to Cite
GiannoccaroG., CastilloM., & BerbelJ. (2016). Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to participate in water allocation trading. A case study in southern Spain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(1), e0101. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016141-7827
Section
Agricultural economics