Evaluation and prioritization of rice production practices and constraints under temperate climatic conditions using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)

  • Shabir A. Mir SKUAST of Kashmir, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (Farm Science Centre) Kulgam, Pombay Kulgam, Jammu & Kashmir
  • Theagarajan Padma SONA College of Technology, Department of Master of Computer Applications, Salem, Chennai
Keywords: analytical hierarchical process, multi-criteria decision making, fuzzy analytical hierarchical processing, biotic and abiotic constraints, rice production practices, Oryza sativa


Due to overwhelming complex and vague nature of interactions between multiple factors describing agriculture, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are widely used from farm to fork to facilitate systematic and transparent decision support, figure out multiple decision outcomes and equip decision maker with confident decision choices in order to choose best alternative. This research proposes a Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) based decision support to evaluate and prioritize important factors of rice production practices and constraints under temperate climatic conditions and provides estimate of weightings, which measure relative importance of critical factors of the crop under biotic, abiotic, socio-economic and technological settings. The results envisage that flood, drought, water logging, late sali, temperature and rainfall are important constraints. However, regulating transplantation time; maintaining planting density; providing training to the educated farmers; introducing high productive varieties like Shalimar Rice-1 and Jhelum; better management of nutrients, weeds and diseases are most important opportunities to enhance rice production in the region. Therefore, the proposed system supplements farmers with precise decision information about important rice production practices, opportunities and constraints.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Theagarajan Padma, SONA College of Technology, Department of Master of Computer Applications, Salem, Chennai
Professor, MCA Department


Adhya TK, Singh ON, Swain P, Ghosh A, 2008. Rice in Eastern India: causes for low productivity and available options. J Rice Res 2 (1): 1-5.

Akpinar N, Talay I, Gun S, 2005. Priority setting in agricultural land-use types for sustainable development. Renew Agric Food Syst 20 (3): 136-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/RAF200483

Alavi, 2014. Fuzzy AHP method for plant species selection in mine reclamation plans: Case study Sungun copper mine. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 11 (5): 23-38.

Baquet A, Hambleton R, Jose D, 1997. Introduction to risk management. Risk Management Agency, USDA, Washington DC, USA. 20 pp.

Barman D, Sahoo R, Chakraborty ND, Kalra N, 2010. Factor productivity and yield gap analysis for agricultural production system in Northwest India. Ind J Dryland Agric Res Dev 25 (2): 100-105.

Beigh MA, Rufaida Mir SZA, Matoo JM, Sibat FK, 2015. Impact analysis of front line demonstration of rice (Oryza sativa) on the yield, economics and farmer's knowledge in temperate region of India. Sci Res Essays 10 (14): 449-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/SRE2015.6284

Bellman RE, Zadeh L, 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci 17: 141-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141

Biswas A, Pal B, 2005. Application of fuzzy goal programming technique to land use planning in agricultural system. Omega 33 (5): 391-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.003

Burrough A, 1989. Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J Soil Sci 40: 477-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1989.tb01290.x

Carrick PJ, Kruger R, 2007. Restoring degraded landscapes in lowland Namaqualand: Lessons from the mining experience and from regional ecological dynamics. J Arid Environ 32: 52-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.08.006

Chand R, Kumar P, Kumar S, 2011. Total factor productivity and contribution of research investment to agricultural growth in India. Policy Paper 25. National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi.

Chang DY, 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95: 649-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

Colin P, Rob N, Brent Y, 2007. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environ Change 17: 472-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.005

Deng H, 1999. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Int J Approx Reason 21 (3): 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(99)00025-0

Fairhurst TH, Witt C, Buresh RJ, Dobermann A, 2007. Rice: A practical guide to nutrient management (2nd ed.). Int Rice Res Inst, Int Plant Nutr Inst, & Int Potash Inst.

Faisul-ur-Rasool, Raihana H, Bhat MI, 2013. Agronomic evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for plant spacings and seedlings per hill under temperate conditions. Afr J Agric Res 8 (37): 4650-4653. http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-full-text-pdf/F4867A538129.

GOI, 2011. Agriculture statistics at a glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Dept. Agric & Coop, New Delhi.

GOI, 2012. Agriculture statistics at a glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Dept. Agric & Coop, New Delhi.

Gupta A, Harboe R, Tabucanon, 2000. Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin. Agric Syst 36 (1): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00067-0

Haq AZM, 2011. Effect of extension contact on rice productivity in some selected sites of gazipur district. Bangladesh J Agr Res 36 (4): 723-732.

Jing C, Jian-ping T, 2010. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of drought vulnerability based on the analytic hierarchy process. An empirical study from Xiaogan City in Hubei Province. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 1: 126-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.015

JKES, 2014. Economic survey of Jammu and Kashmir State, Government of J&K.

Juan S, Quangong C, Ruijun L, Wenlan J, 2004. An application of the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic inference in a decision support system for forage selection. New Zeal J Agric Res 47 (3): 327-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2004.9513601

Laborte AG, de Bie CAJM, Smaling EMA, Moya P, Boling AA, van Ittersum MK, 2012. Rice yields and yield gaps in Southeast Asia: Past trends and future outlook. Eur J Agron 36 (1): 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.08.005

Li L, Shi ZH, Yin W, Zhu D, Ng SL, Cai CF, Wu GL,2009. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecol Model 220 (23): 3439-3447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.005

Licker R, Johnston M, Foley JA, Barford C, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, 2010. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the 'yield gap' of croplands around the world? Global Ecol Biogeogr 19: 769-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00563.x

Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB, 2009. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes and causes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34 (4): 179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740

Lu L, Zhi-Hua S, Wei Y, Dun Z, Sai LN, Chong-Fa C, A-Lin L, 2009. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area China. Ecol Model 220 (23): 3439-3447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.005

Mahendra S, 2011. Yield gap and production constraints in rice-wheat system: scenario from eastern Uttar Pradesh. Bangladesh J Agr Res 36 (4): 623-632.

Meysam S, Mahsa A, Sajad E, 2012. Using fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for ranking the web browsers. Int J Econ Manage Sci 1 (8): 72-86.

Mikhailov L, 2004. A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. Eur J Oper Res 159: 687-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00432-6

Mohaddes A, Mohayidin G, 2008. Application of the fuzzy approach for agricultural production planning in a watershed, a case study of the Atrak watershed, Iran. Am-Euras J Agr Environ Sci 3 (4): 636-648.

Nag A,Singh R, Burman RR, Mondal B, 2013. Factors responsible for rice cultivation technology use in Burdwan district of West Bengal. Ind J Agric Res 47 (4): 329-334.

Narayanamoorthy A, 2007. Deceleration in agricultural growth: Technology or policy fatigue. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (25): 2375-2379.

Padma T, Balasubramanie S, 2011. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy processing decision support system to analyze occupational menace forecasting the spawning of shoulder and neck pain. Expert Syst Appl 38: 15303-15309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.037

Prakash TN, 2003. Land suitability analysis for agricultural crops: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Masters degree thesis, Int. Inst. for Geo-Inform. & Earth Observ., Enschede, The Netherlands.

Pushpa, Srivastava SK, 2014. Yield gap analysis and the determinants of yield gap in major crops in eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. Economic Affairs 59 (4): 653-662.

Rajaram S, 1998. Approaches for breaking yield stagnation−CIMMYT's perspective. In: Wheat research needs beyond 2000; Nagarajan et al. (eds.). Narosa Publ, New Delhi.

Saaty TL, 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, NY.

Sánchez-Moreno JF, Farshad A, Petter PP, 2014. Farmer or expert−A comparison between three land suitability assessments for upland rice and rubber in Phonexay District, Lao Pdr. Ecopersia 1 (3): 235-260.

Singha AK, Baruah MJ, 2011. Farmers' adoption behaviour in rice technology: an analysis of adoption behaviour of farmers in rice technology under different farming systems in Assam. J Hum Ecol 35 (3): 167-172.

Srdjevic B, MedeirosYDP, 2008. Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manage 22: 877-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9197-5

Stigter K, 2008. Coping with climate risk in agricultural needs farmer oriented research and extension policies. Scientia Agricola 65: 108-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000700016

Toledo R, Engler A, Ahumada V, 2011. Evaluation of risk factors in agriculture: An application of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) methodology. Chil J Agric Res 71 (1): 114-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392011000100014

Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W, 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11: 229-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7

Wani MH, Baba SH, Rama Sundaram P, Yousuf S, Yousuf S, 2013. Has adoption of improved rice technology enhanced economic and livelihood security in Kashmir Valley? Agr Econ Res Rev 26: 165-171.

Zadeh LA, 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Zangeneh M, Akram A, Nielsen P, Keyhani A, 2015. Developing location indicators for Agricultural Service Center: A Delphi-TOPSIS-FAHP approach. Prod Manufact Res 3 (1): 124-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2015.1013582

Zhu KJ, Jing Y, Chang DY, 1999. A discussion on extent analysis method andapplications of fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 116: 450-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00331-2

Zimmerman HJ, 1994. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Acad Publ, Boston, MA, USA.

How to Cite
MirS. A., & PadmaT. (2017). Evaluation and prioritization of rice production practices and constraints under temperate climatic conditions using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(4), e0909. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016144-8699
Plant production (Field and horticultural crops)